0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 07:35:39 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.48	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.21/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NzkFcVO6cm/E---3.1_15264.p
0.21/0.50	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting sh1l with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# post_as_ho1 with pid 15343 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# new_ho_10 with pid 15347 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# Proof found!
0.21/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_29, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_30, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_36, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_37, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_38, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(intersection, axiom, ((intersection)=(^[X9:$i > $o, X10:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X9 @ X4)&(X10 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NzkFcVO6cm/E---3.1_15264.p', intersection)).
0.21/0.50	thf(setminus, axiom, ((setminus)=(^[X11:$i > $o, X12:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X11 @ X4)&~((X12 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NzkFcVO6cm/E---3.1_15264.p', setminus)).
0.21/0.50	thf(thm, conjecture, ![X22:$i > $o, X23:$i > $o]:(((setminus @ X22 @ (intersection @ X22 @ X23))=(setminus @ X22 @ X23))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NzkFcVO6cm/E---3.1_15264.p', thm)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_3, plain, ((intersection)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((setminus)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&~((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[setminus])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(![X22:$i > $o, X23:$i > $o, X26:$i]:((((X22 @ X26)&~(((X22 @ X26)&(X23 @ X26))))<=>((X22 @ X26)&~((X23 @ X26)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))&((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0))))&((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))&(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))&(((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))&(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 29
0.21/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 20
0.21/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.21/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 4
0.21/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.21/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.21/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 2
0.21/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 0
0.21/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.21/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.21/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.50	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.21/0.50	# Total rewrite steps                  : 3
0.21/0.50	# ...of those cached                   : 2
0.21/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.21/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.21/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.21/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.21/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.21/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.21/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.21/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 4
0.21/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1015
0.21/0.50	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 162
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
0.21/0.50	% E---3.1 exiting
0.21/0.50	% E exiting
0.21/0.50	EOF